Which of the following is true about the use of force policy with electronic control weapons?

The statement that the force must end when the threat is over is aligned with the principles of proportionality and necessity in the use of force policy. In law enforcement, the use of force, including the deployment of electronic control weapons, should be appropriate to the level of threat posed by a suspect.

Once the imminent threat is neutralized, the use of force must cease. This ensures that the response remains justified and does not escalate unnecessarily, thereby protecting both the suspect's rights and the integrity of the law enforcement agency. It underscores the importance of using force in a calculated manner, appropriate to the situation at hand. Ending the use of force when the threat is over helps to ensure accountability and the ethical application of police tactics.

In contrast, the other statements suggest actions or situations that do not align with best practices in use of force policies. For example, continuing force until incapacitation may lead to excessive use of force, and requiring supervisory consultation before using force would create impractical delays in critical situations. Moreover, asserting that no guidelines exist for the use of force contradicts established policies that govern law enforcement behavior, emphasizing how critical it is for officers to operate within defined parameters.